The hard truth of soft skills and happy customers
It’s truly incredible the strong connection between agent soft skills and customer satisfaction. In fact, our recent State of CX research report lays out this connection clearly. We analyzed over a billion CX interactions to tease out critical CX insights every CX leader should know. And this is one of them—the better your agents can bring a human touch and empathy to interactions, the happier your customers will be.We broke it down even further—the more types of positive soft skills your agents demonstrate, the happier customers are. This includes behaviors such as building rapport, acknowledging loyalty, being empathetic, and demonstrating ownership. If this isn’t a strong validation of the power of agent soft skills, then nothing else is. Or as I like to say, “the proof is in the pudding.”Companies can achieve this uptick in customer satisfaction by emphasizing soft skill behaviors over mere process and technical training. Delivering company policy in a monotone voice, with no empathy towards the customer’s plight, doesn’t make anybody feel better. That’s true even if the agent’s chosen words are otherwise correct and prompt. The human touch really matters. In other words, it’s much more than simply saying a canned type sounding response such as “I understand” or “I can see how that would make you feel”.The hard truth of manual evaluations
For a long time, the only feasible way to evaluate agent performance was for a supervisor to manually review a handful of interactions. This small sample was often randomly chosen, and so they could easily be skewed to the positive or negative, just based on chance. Furthermore, the supervisor would have their own natural biases in assessing the interactions, so the evaluation, in the end, could be downright unfair. At worst, this practice could lead to job dissatisfaction, a high number of quality score disputes, and insufficient insight into customer satisfaction trends.But now with the power and scale of AI, supervisors can have every single agent interaction analyzed. And with AI doing the work, the evaluations are objective. CXone Mpower for Customer Satisfaction does exactly this, using a consistent measuring stick for agents’ soft skills. Contact center leaders can easily understand agent performance on an individual and aggregate level and improve customer satisfaction.Enlighten AI can make soft skill evaluation a breeze
Enlighten AI is the brain behind customer satisfaction that drives exceptional CX outcomes with ease. Enlighten AI uses natural language processing and machine learning to analyze customer interactions across channels. It detects language nuances, identifies emotional cues, and categorizes sentiment accurately and quickly, offering a real-time view of how to improve all customer interactions.Sentiment is a measure of a customers’ emotions towards your product or service, and it can capture the full spectrum of customer feelings, opinions, and perceptions across all interactions and touchpoints. Sentiment scoring is a proven predictive indicator of customer satisfaction such as NPS and CSAT surveys.NICE CXone Mpower Customer Satisfaction scores agents on nine different behaviors that directly impact the sentiment score, so that companies can better understand their customers’ thoughts and feelings across the board and make data-driven decisions.
NICE CXone Mpower CSAT make customers happy at top companies
Leading businesses succeed with CXone Mpower CSAT, and it proves this is a surefire method to please customers.Open Network Exchange (ONE) started using CSAT by homing in on four specific agent behaviors—demonstrating ownership, active listening, building rapport, and effective questioning—to better understand how those behaviors are tied to customer frustration, sentiment, and silent time during interactions.Within 90 days of implementing CSAT, the company shifted the way it coaches agents, saving an average of four to five hours of time per supervisor per week. Supervisors have insight into coaching opportunities for each individual agent, each team, and globally for the entire contact center. Rather than relying on QA evaluations as they did in the past, they can quickly search by specific categories or behaviors, such as frustrated contacts or calls where agents received a negative score for effective questioning.“It’s amazing what this system can really do when you use it the right way . . . Besides just saving time, I think the biggest effect has been on the employees themselves, because they’re getting coaching that’s catered to their specific opportunities on 100% of their total interactions.”
Alexandria DoucetQuality Assurance Manager at ONE
We feel positive we have the correct evaluation questions in place because we continue to see improvement in sentiment month-over-month.
Morgan GraySenior manager, customer experience field management at Republic Services